Sunday, December 11, 2011
Reflection of Research Course
I felt that this course overall was very easy to follow and understand. Everything was clearly explained and organized.However, I thought that the lectures basically contained information that we read or were told about in weekly overviews. Honestly, I did not find the lectures that necessary. I thought that the readings were very helpful and were an easy read. Both books contained vital information for action research that I did not know. On the other hand, I thought that it would have been more helpful if we were told about purchasing the books earlier or if the assigned readings would not start the first week. I had to have a rush on the books so I could do the assignment. I thought the assignments were relevant to what we needed to do for the action research study. I also thought that they were not too difficult that it took hours to complete. They were appropriate and reasonable. The discussion board questions and topics were helpful in the action research plan by posting responses to what we have been doing. Since not many people posted comments on our blogs this was the only source of feedback. I think that it should have been posted the first week that we need to post on others blogs. We were not told about this until week 3 and therefore I personally got behind.
Updated Action Research Plan
Action Research Plan | ||||
Goal: For 6th Grade students to improve their fitness levels in 6 months, by having Fitnessgram software and non-traditional exercises built into their physical education class | ||||
Action Steps(s): | Person(s) Responsible: | Timeline: Start/End | Needed Resources | Evaluation |
Conduct Fitnessgram fitness testing | Janean Marxen Jay Mastandrea* Tom Hochkeppel* Robyn Levine* (*other PE teachers in my school) | October 15th to October 31st | Fitnessgram software | Compute all scores into Fitnessgram software |
Decide what non-traditional activities are to be incorporated into the class | Janean Marxen | November 15th to May 15th | Jay Mastandrea Tom Hochkeppel Robyn Levine Online resources | Group dialogue (once a month meeting to decide what we will do for that month) |
Give students recording of their fitness scores from Fitnessgram software | Janean Marxen Jay Mastandrea Tom Hochkeppel Robyn Levine | November 15th to December 15th | Fitnessgram software | Handouts from Fitnessgram software |
Incorporate non-traditional activities into daily warm-up routines | Janean Marxen Jay Mastandrea Tom Hochkeppel Robyn Levine | November 15th to May 15th | Each other and online sources | Group dialogue (once a week to discuss progress) |
Class discussion about fitness progress, activities, and software use with students | Janean Marxen Jay Mastandrea Tom Hochkeppel Robyn Levine | November 15th to May 15th | Students | Group dialogue once a month |
Conduct Fitnessgram fitness testing | Janean Marxen Jay Mastandrea Tom Hochkeppel Robyn Levine | May 1st to May 15th | Fitnessgram software | Compute all scores into Fitnessgram software |
Give students recording of their fitness scores from Fitnessgram software | Janean Marxen Jay Mastandrea Tom Hochkeppel Robyn Levine | May 15th to June 1st | Fitnessgram software | Handouts from Fitnessgram software |
Compile results from Fall and Spring testing | Janean Marxen | June 1st to June 15th | Self | Charts |
Analyze data | Janean Marxen | June 15th to June 30th | Previous studies from other researchers | Research project completed |
CARE Model: Planning Tool
Identify Concerns that must change (look to the future)
(Assign points to concerns from 1 to 3 in the order of the most important issues to consider.)
1. Childhood Obesity
2. Improvement of student learning
3. Improvement of teacher learning
Identify Affirmations that must be sustained (look to the present)
(Assign points to affirmations from 1 to 3 in the order of the most important issues to consider.)
1. Student participation in program
2. Student enjoyment of program
3. Teacher collaboration within department
SMART Recommendations that must be implemented:
(Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Timely)
(Assign points to recommendations from 1 to 3 in the order of the most important recommendations to implement.)
1. Is student learning taking place?
2. Are teachers consistently incorporating non-traditional activities?
3. Are students enjoying the program?
EVALUATE – Specifically and Often
(Identify the best ways to evaluate the implemented recommendations.)
1. Reflective conversations with students monthly about activities and use of technology
2. Group discussions (departmental evaluation of activities implemented)
3. Walk-throughs (at least once a day) to see if students are having fun
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)